 |
Theory of Knowledge
Booker
T. Washington High School |
Focus:
The focus in the IB Theory of Knowledge course is to examine what we know
in the various fields of knowledge and how we know it.
Rationale:
The subjects
that we study in our high school careers are, perhaps of necessity,
compartmentalized – History, Sciences, Mathematics, Foreign Language,
Literature, etc. It is rare that students can view these disciplines under
any larger perspective. This is essentially the aim of the Theory of
Knowledge course - to view the knowledge disciplines from the perspective of
knowledge itself, noting the similarities and differences in the formations
of knowledge, and noting the strengths and limitations in the various
approaches to knowledge.
What Theory of Knowledge is Not:
TOK is
not simply a philosophy course that studies the nature, methods,
limitations, and validity of knowledge. It is not solely a course in logic
or “critical thinking,” though it touches on logic as an element of logic
formation and justification. It is not a course that promotes relativism
over absolutism, for it approaches both of these positions with a critical
eye to their strengths and weaknesses. Nor is it a course that sets out to
change someone’s mind about moral, aesthetic, or religious issues.
AIMS of the
Theory of Knowledge course:
§
to
consider what it means to know something
§
to
consider the relationship between knowledge and the world
§
to
consider the strengths and limitations of different ways of knowing
OBJECTIVES of the
Theory of Knowledge course:
§
to
relate subjects to each other and to personal knowledge and experience
§
to
understand and appreciate the importance of inquiry as a basis for knowledge
§
to
recognize the biases inherent in each discipline
§
to
apply recognized criteria to evaluate issues and questions from varying
viewpoints
§
to
appreciate the relationship of knowledge to culture
TOPICS of the
Theory of Knowledge course
include:
§
comparing four ways of thinking: analytical, empirical, moral, aesthetic
§
understanding the roles of language and logical argument in knowledge
§
examining different knowledge systems: mathematics, natural sciences, human
sciences, history
§
examining value judgment, bias, and culture across disciplines |